Speed Cushions
How Do Speed Cushions Work? 2026 Engineering Explainer
Cojo
Invalid Date
6 min read
A speed cushion works by exploiting a width difference: passenger-car rear-axle track widths are 50 to 65 inches, while fire engines and aerial ladder trucks are 78 to 84 inches. The cushion is split into segments with gaps sized to the wider fire-apparatus width, so the fire truck straddles the device with one tire path on each side, while the narrower-track passenger car hits the cushion segments full-on. The Federal Highway Administration's Traffic Calming ePrimer Module 3.4 and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Traffic Calming Manual, Chapter 3, document the geometry and the published research behind it.
A speed cushion is a discriminating traffic-calming device. It applies vertical deflection to one class of vehicle (passenger cars) while letting another class (fire apparatus, ambulances, and some bus types) pass with minimal deflection. The discrimination is achieved entirely by geometry: wheel-track gaps sized to fire-apparatus axle width.
A speed bump or speed hump is non-discriminating. Both produce the same vertical deflection on every vehicle that crosses, regardless of axle width. Fire trucks crossing a speed hump are slowed to 8 to 12 mph; ambulances slow to similar speeds; passenger cars slow to 15 to 20 mph. The non-discrimination is what makes humps and bumps unsuitable for fire-access streets.
A speed cushion preserves the deflection effect for cars (slowing them to 18 to 22 mph) while removing it for fire apparatus (which straddles the cushion at near-posted speed). The published research supporting this behavior comes from ITE's 2018 study on fire-apparatus interaction with traffic-calming devices and from FHWA Module 3.4 documentation.
When a passenger car approaches a 3-segment speed cushion (2 outside-lane segments plus 1 center segment, with two outside wheel-track gaps):
The deflection event is identical to a 3-inch speed hump in terms of vertical motion, but the cushion's segmented configuration is what allows the next paragraph's behavior for fire trucks.
When a Type 1 fire engine (rear-axle track width 80 to 84 inches) approaches the same cushion:
The result: fire-truck delay drops from 5 to 9 seconds per device (typical for a speed hump) to under 2 seconds per device. The USFA Emergency Vehicle Safety Initiative publishes this delay difference as one of the strongest arguments for speed cushion adoption on fire-access streets.
ITE Traffic Calming Manual Chapter 3 documents typical speed cushion before-and-after speed studies as showing:
These numbers compare with 22 to 40% speed reduction for speed humps and 35 to 50% for speed bumps. Cushions trade some speed-reduction effectiveness for the emergency-vehicle access preservation.
The wheel-track gap dimension is what makes a speed cushion a cushion (rather than a poorly designed speed hump). If the gap is too narrow, the fire truck cannot straddle and behaves like a hump. If the gap is too wide, passenger cars can position their wheels to pass through both gaps and avoid deflection entirely.
The optimal gap is sized to the fire-apparatus axle width that uses the street: typically 1.85 meters (72 to 73 inches) for older European-spec apparatus, often 80 to 84 inches for North American Type 1 engines and aerial ladder trucks. NFPA 1141 chapter 5 provides the framework municipalities use to evaluate the gap dimension.
For dimensional detail see speed cushion dimensions.
Most North American transit buses have rear-axle track widths in the 78 to 82 inch range, similar to fire apparatus. Buses straddle most fire-access cushions with the same behavior as fire trucks. School buses and articulated transit vehicles run wider and even more easily clear typical cushion gaps.
This means a speed cushion preserves transit service while still calming passenger-car speeds, which is why cushions are favored on residential streets that are also bus routes. For transit-corridor specifications see speed tables on bus routes.
Speed cushions fail to produce the expected speed reduction in three scenarios:
For multi-cushion corridor design see the best speed cushions for fire access sibling article and the speed cushions guide for the broader product overview.
On a Tigard fire-access greenway in late 2024, Cojo installed a set of three modular rubber speed cushions configured to a 1.85-meter wheel-track gap. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue measured response delay before and after install: 1.8 seconds per cushion at code-3 response, total of 5.4 seconds across the three-cushion corridor. A traditional speed hump configuration on the same street would have produced 18 to 27 seconds of delay across three devices. The cushion configuration was the only design that preserved the response time while still reducing 85th-percentile passenger-car speeds from 31 mph to 21 mph.
Always verify current requirements with your local jurisdiction. This article reflects May 2026 published guidance.
Cojo coordinates fire-marshal review and dimensional sign-off on every cushion install across the Oregon I-5 corridor. We document the as-built wheel-track gap on the project drawing and submit close-out documentation to the city engineering department. For the install procedure see the install how-to in the cluster, and for the broader product context see the speed cushions guide. For Bend-area installs see Speed Cushion Installation Bend or pair installation with our asphalt maintenance services. Get a custom quote.
A practical guide to sealcoating apartment and condo parking lots. Covers phased scheduling, tenant communication, cost allocation, liability, and ROI for property value.
Get accurate 2026 asphalt paving costs for Oregon driveways, parking lots, and roads. Per-square-foot pricing, cost factors, and money-saving tips.
Compare asphalt and concrete driveways side by side: cost, durability, maintenance, appearance, and climate performance for Oregon homes.
Have a question about this topic? We'll respond within 24 hours.